Police Brutality
A TYPICAL CASE OF POLICE ABUSED AUTHORITY
David Carter ( 1985,322) offers
perhaps the most comprehensive definition of police abuse authority, arguing
that it is best described as an action by a police officer without regard to
motive, intent or malice that tends to injure,insult,tread on human dignity,
manifest feeling of inferiority and /or violate an inherent legal right of a
member of public. Carters definition considers three broad areas of police
abuse including, physical, psychology and legal domains.
This is
what happened on 06.05.2014. Our client was in his house with his wife, when 4 plainclothes
men that identified themselves verbally as policemen entered his house. The 4
plainclothes policemen handcuffed our client in his bedroom. Subsequently our
client was interrogated in the living room with regards to some drugs to which
our client denied any knowledge there of whatsoever.
After
much insistence, they went out of the client’s house, brought in some substance
suspected to be drugs and again asked for his explanation who once, again
denied any knowledge whatsoever. This was quickly followed by numerous assaults
and attack on our client by first policemen, and subsequently brought him to
the Ipoh District Police Headquarters.
Our
client was remanded on the next day and brought to the police lock up. There he
was beaten and assaulted up by the first policemen wrongfully and
intentionally. The first policemen allowed other parties to assault our
client. It was later discovered that the victim head was severely injured due
to the assaults and he lost consciousness subsequently. He was taken to the
Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Ipoh.
By
such conduct, the 4-plainclothes policemen acted wrongfully and illegally
because they acted outside the powers given to them by brutally assaulting our
client and allowing another policeman to do so.
It was obvious the imprisonment of our client
was rendered unlawful and a clear abuse
of police authority. We filed a suit against the police force for the
assaults our client suffered and we could not get access to any of the
particulars requested in the Discovery Application despite numerous written
requests to the police force.
Subsequently, we continued to file the suit first and then immediately applied for a Discovery Application. The decision was favorable to us once High Court ordered to disclose lock up diary and CCTV recordings.
Subsequently, we continued to file the suit first and then immediately applied for a Discovery Application. The decision was favorable to us once High Court ordered to disclose lock up diary and CCTV recordings.
Comments